The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. –xeno (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article was used to recreate the North American Subaru Impreza Owners' Club, which under NASIOC is a deleted material following nomination and an unsuccessful appeal for undeletion. When that article was recreated, there was no difference between this nominated article and the other article which is placed as CSD G4.

Refer to Notice to admin King Evo VIII of Lancerlot.

(talk) 13:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Very weak keep - it wasn't this user who re-introduced the material into the mainspace. Then again, it doesn't look like it's moving at all towards our inclusion criteria. Nevertheless, Beethoven05 may still wish to work with the material in his userspace. –xeno (talk) 13:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - The page was userfied after a contentous deletion debate in case anyone wanted to reference the information. I'm not sure who recreated the NASIOC article, but please keep this in my user space. Honestly, is it suprising that "Evo VIII" wants an Impreza page removed? Beethoven05 (talk) 21:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Conditional withdrawal of nomination - I will got with Beethoven's rationale, providing that in future, it will be his responsibility that he must not allow his article to be recreated unless all inclusion criteria is met. If this condition fails (ie, recreated by a 3rd party user), it is his responsibility to issue a WP:CSD G4 (((db-repost))) on them. Should this fail, then this article will be put on deletion nomination. But then, I will save him the hassle and recommend both red links salted away to prevent recreation as it was recreated a number of times. Also I would like to point out that this nomination was done in a good faith and has nothing to do with my username. King Evo VIII of Lancerlot (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I apologize for implying that - it is just that the original NASIOC AfD nomination in the was from someone who had a personal issue with NASIOC or Imprezas. I was hoping this wasn't the case again. Beethoven05 (talk) 18:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, potential article, that could become satisfactory at a future time point. It is already in a subpage, this is the best spot for it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Valid use of userspace. And all articles in mainspace must meet the criteria suggested. Those criteria do not apply to userspace. Salting would accomplish nothing, and it not called for. Collect (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.