The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per WP:G7. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Kuala Lumpur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Yet another fully-automated pseudo-portal whose "selected articles" list is drawn solely from a navbox, viz. ((Kuala Lumpur)).

As such it is merely a WP:REDUNDANTFORK of the navbox. The head article Kuala Lumpur is a much better navigational hub.

Some editors may believe that we should have a portal on this city. I am unpersuaded, but I don't think here is a cosnsensus either way on whether Level-4 Vital article (i.e. in the 1,001–10,000 range of priority topics) is a suitable topic .... but either way this portal that we have now is not worth keeping. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• If we have portals this is a valid topic but this is yet another one click wonder portal. Does not matter who made the click, it creates automatically breaking pages when you "Created page with '((subst:Basic portal start page))'" So Delete Legacypac (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:G7. No prejudice against later creation of a non-automated, handmade portal. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:51, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.