The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted under criterion G11. (non-admin closure) ToThAc (talk) 22:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Khowar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this page created for self promotion by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Akbaralighazi.. Saqib (talk) 13:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thomas.W: what do you think ? should it be deleted or kept? --Saqib (talk) 14:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Transwiki to Wikiversity. This looks more Wikiversitesque than Wikipediesque. KMF (talk) 15:03, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy deletion. I have nominated it for WP:CSD G5 (creation by banned or blocked user) since it was created by a sock, and all substantial edits to it have also been made by blocked socks. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 17:31, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I see more of the blatant self-promotion that this editor is famed for (all without proper sourcing). In this case:

"A beautiful example of Rachitrali's Troyki:

اللہ مہ خودای تہ نام رحمان دی رحیم دی

تو غفار دی، غفورالرحیم دی

کرم کوس اسپہ سورا تو رب کریم دی "

(Rachitrali is the creator of the portal and the author of that self-praise, is indef blocked as part of the sock group, and the article he wrote about himself has been deleted as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rehmat Aziz Chitrali (2nd nomination) as having insufficient reliable in-depth sourcing to support notability). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Boing! said Zebedee: He's been very active today under his own name, User:Rehmat Aziz Chitrali, as well as a few now CU-blocked socks, among other things creating the now deleted self-praising Rehmat Aziz Chitrali Gold Medalist. Which made me go through the edits of the newly discovered socks and nominate a bunch of articles etc etc they had created for CSD G5. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:14, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so I see, and now blocked. Good work :-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.