The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Julius Caesar (play) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Insufficient scope for a portal. Per WP:POG portals should have a broad scope and diversified content. A single play isn't a broad scope. Category:Julius Caesar (play) contains 18 articles, most of which are about adaptations of the play, and the rest are famous quotes from it. That's not going to make a very interesting or diverse portal. The portal has been bulked out with articles on the real life people portrayed in the play, which strikes me as dubious. The topic would be better covered at Portal:Shakespeare and/or Portal:Julius Caesar. Hut 8.5 18:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not a broad enough topic for a portal. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the need to DAB (play) should have been a clue this duplicates scope of another portal. Legacypac (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Legacypac is right, and so is Espresso Addict. Absurdly narrow. I don't even think that the subject needs a portal, and I am not expressing an opinion as to whether the author needs a portal. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.