The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Edward VIII abdication crisis[edit]

Overly narrow scope per WP:POG. There are 31 articles in the relevant category and some are pretty tenous for inclusion here, e.g. Wedding dress of Wallis Warfield, or Michael Joseph Savage (which barely mentions the crisis at all). Hut 8.5 22:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete what the heck was the creator thinking? No need for a portal on this topic. Not even sure we would need Portal:Edward VIII Legacypac (talk) 22:22, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Many of these articles are of peripheral relevance. This seems like the sort of constrained topic that is well suited to articles and not at all to portals. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with the nom that this is too narrow a topic. — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 23:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We can guess that the creator was thinking that creating portals is fun. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is too much of a microtopic, and I don't think it's even a merge-and-redirect (to a portal on the British royal family), as it's just one of many such crises and shouldn't overshadow other material in the broader categorization. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.