The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: merge to Chow group. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Operational Chow ring (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Nov 2015 draft unimproved since. Deleted and REFUNDed 6 month ago Legacypac (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep/Merge to Chow group: This is a part of bivariant theory. I suppose we can merge it with Chow group but at some point we need to start a standalone article on bivariant theory and this draft should be incorporated into it. —- Taku (talk) 11:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Chow group Will get more eyes there. Can be incorporated into standalone article on bivariant theory, if and when that page gets created. Paul August ☎ 19:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.