The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Note (mostly to user:Jdxzhu) that this means keep the draft. It bears no indication to whether it should be moved to article space, or not; nor to the draft not being eventually deleted later on - Nabla (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hongchi Xiao

[edit]

Repeated tries, no notability. Earlier versions were strongly promotional for his alternative medicine practice DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first wiki article. I have read the policies and guidelines before starting the article. I spent weeks working on it. Maybe my understanding of wikipedia is different from DGG's. Repeated tries only mean that I am learning and trying to have a clearer understanding of what wiki can or can't accept. Keep on nominating to delete the draft will not help me learn. Thank you for your care, DGG. jdxzhu 04:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC) Thank you to whoever for adding this link/ in the reference section. It was a reference used in the previous draft under "Australian Incident" that has been deleted when the draft was first tagged with speedy deletion. Please give me time to learn and rewrite. Thank you! jdxzhu 04:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdxzhu (talk • contribs)
~~Comment~~ Keep There appear to be a number of newspaper sources about this person. Although some are rather negative, they do contain facts which could be used to make an article. Of course, one would have to be written that was neutral and didn't promote the subject's views, and also concise, without excessive detail not mentioned in independent sources. It's quite acceptable to improve the draft while the discussion is going on.—Anne Delong (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changing my post to "Keep" now that the draft is moving toward factual content, although it still needs more information about negative press during his tour to balance the positive information in the article before it will be ready for the main encyclopedia.—Anne Delong (talk) 04:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - whether or not a previous version was spammy is irrelevant to this draft. Sources seem to exist; it's certainly not A7 speedy materiel (if it were in articlespace). Huon (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for allowing me the time to rewrite the draft. Please let me know what I can do to improve the current draft so that it can be accepted by wikipedia. Email was sent on November 11th to give copyright permission on pictures used in the previous version of the draft. The waiting time is about 20 days to get copyright license. The pictures should be restored after the copyright issue is cleard. Please let me know if it is okay to resubmit at this point. I appreciate all your support and help! jdxzhu 17:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdxzhu (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.