This page, part of the Graphics Lab Wikiproject, is an archive of requests for October 2008.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. You can submit new requests here.
I have been looking for a very long time for another version of this image. it would seem that there is none. The shiled itself is an easy part to do, the only main problem ( and the reason why it has not been done) is becouse of the seal bellow the shield and the wheat/feathers arround it. they are no clear enough nor there is a clear text (that i can read) in wich it describes what it should contain. so there is no way to realistically retrace it as svg -LadyofHats (talk) 11:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Given the nice result of the first try, could you convert the *pdf given above into an *svg and color the segments like shown in the *png?Jasy jatere (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
looks good. There are some details which could be improved.
last character in the k-row, red part: only the bottom "bowl" thick like that, the rest of the red part must be much thinner. Compare the different thickness of lines for p
I'd started a work on it but hadn't had a chance to upload until now. I've used the unicode characters from the Sinhala alphabet page (specifically p, k, r and ḷ from the consonants table and the a, u and ū from the vowels table. However, as you can see in the svg above I haven't completed the ku and kū because I can't see which characters in the table match the shapes in the pdf. Do you know which shape it should be, or if it is even in those tables, part of another character, etc? — ₪₪ch1902₪₪11:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
for Lu/Luu, you can use the shapes provided for ä/ää.
for ku/kuu, there are no shapes you could copy in the imgs. The hook for short u is very similar to a Latin 'c'. The hook for uu varies, but if you take the right part of ruu and clip the 'tail' and bend it and then scale the whole thing down, you come close to it (hope that was clear ...)
Lu/Luu are missing the hairstroke on the left
smaller notes: the right arm of p should not touch the belly
got inkscape and meddled a bit with the img. The L's are fine now. I do not know how to 'cut' stuff, so the red parts for ku and kuu still have their topmost line, which should probably deleted. The z-like part in kuu, ruu and Luu needs to be thicker, but I do not know how to do that either, so I would appreciate help there Jasy jatere (talk) 00:03, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion:
I've had a good go at this one, but the resolution of the image is simply too low to get anything usable. I've also had a look at the source but I can't extract anything from that of significantly better quality. If all you want is a very abstracted view of the main chambers only (the colored bits) it would be possible to create that from scratch. The fine detail underneath the processor, however, is virtually unreadable even when magnified. Debate木12:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Is that stuff down there absolutely critical? EG. I can tell that one part of it is a stairwell, which isn't very helpful other than giving scale... 68.39.174.238 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to the diagram there appears to be a range of other mechanical bits and pieces (motor, shale feed, riding rings, etc), in addition to some of the internal detail, that are too blurry to easily convert to SVG. Whether they are critical to the diagram or not is something only Kaldari can answer. Debate木08:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think those pieces are really critical to the diagram. Have a go at a simplified version and I'll let you know if anything really important is missing. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 20:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I plan to change I changed the margins on this pic, mostly reducing the upper and lower margins. Then, I think I will try to fix up the *.PNG version a little. Maybe somebody can try something after that. H Padleckas (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: Since this is the current edition, it would probably be easiest for someone to just rescan their copy. This one looks weird because it's been laminated and exposed to some water. Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of the 11th edition, or I'd do it myself. I presume we can't just swipe amazon's image? — ʞɔıu07:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: I tried to modify the first image for the moment. Unfortunately the the photographed picture is a reproduction print with a very visible halftone raster. I tried to get rid of it using selective gausian blur. What do you think? Unfortunately during the image upload an error occurred on Wikimedia Commons and your original picture disappeared from the history. If you do not have a copy I have it on my hard disk. --pabouk (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tax comparison chart. 2008 U.S. presidential campaign
And many more, especially in other languages, if an SVG chart is used as the base chart.
Request: I would like some SVG bar charts. Possibly in some of the formats found here: [1]. See the bar charts on pages 38, 39, 46. I want to use CNN's numbers and labels, though, as in the above chart. They make a lot more sense. "Quintiles" have been converted to income ranges. Percentages have been converted to dollar numbers. --Timeshifter (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: I'll take this one. I'll do a gnuplot graph along the lines of the ones you suggest from the TPC report. — ʞɔıu07:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't been able to get to this, and it's time-sensitive so I'm going to let someone else take it. I'm sorry for the delay. — ʞɔıu13:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thanks for trying. I did create a basic GIF image for starters, Image:Obama McCain taxes.gif. See in the above gallery. Here are some bar chart possibilities if anybody can help: Commons:Bar chart (many bar charts organized by type).
(unindent)Maybe income tax percentages would be better than actual dollar amounts. Since the change in tax rates as a range of percentages is much smaller than the dollar changes. Percentages were used in the bar charts on pages 38, 39, 46 of [2].
Maybe dollar amounts could be used if the table was broken up into 2 bar charts. One would cover the lower 7 income brackets. The other bar chart would cover the upper 2 income brackets. I think this would look good, and be easily understood without having to have a wide range in variation of length in the bars. --Timeshifter (talk) 12:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This photo of Sarah Palin is, in itself, notable, as it is a unique piece of photographic evidence relevant to a high-profile part of her biography. (Retouched)
Request: . As you can see, the image quality is poor due to backlight. If anybody could fix this up - fixing the contrast and color balance and, if possible, removing the purple fringing around her head - that would be really appreciated. Thanks. Homunq (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(better here than my talk page) That is much better on the flesh tones. However, the whites (both on the T-shirt and in the background) are still too blue. Thanks for your work. Homunq (talk) 20:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. However, the paper on her desk and the stuff outside still have a blue cast which I think is an artifact. Anyway, thanks. Homunq (talk) 20:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Attempt 2: Even wider, my personal favorite (despite the waving hand on the right :)
Attempt 2: Even wider, my personal favorite (despite the waving hand on the right :)
Attempt 3: Slightly modified version of Ferrylodge's crop
Attempt 3: Slightly modified version of Ferrylodge's crop
Article(s):Sarah PalinRequest: Hi, this image is at the top of the article. As you'll see at the image page, it was created by cropping a much larger image, zooming, and sharpening. I did all this myself, but my software is crummy. Can you do a better job? Thanks.Ferrylodge (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Graphist opinion: Would you object to a wider crop—closer to the lectern, maybe just above the sheet of paper she's holding, and all the way to her right shoulder? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The main thing is to have the eyes centered. Some people asked for that at the article talk page. As far as how wide the crop is, please use your best judgment. You folks are the experts, not me. :-) Maybe you could do one with the existing crop, and one with the wider crop?Ferrylodge (talk) 01:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Quality-wise, the "tracksuit" image (which was in the article for quite a while) is still the best, despite the awkward composition. I think the one above is the best substitute right now. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, here we go. I've made three attempts; I recommend no. 2, but I'll leave it up to you to decide which is best :) Please let me know which one you'd like to keep and I'll move it to Commons under a more descriptive filename. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll go with your choice, despite the hand (it kind of humanizes the whole thing, makes it look real and spontaneous, and will make for an interesting topic of conversation). #2 it is!. BTW, did you do any sharpening?Ferrylodge (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, I think the head's too tiny on #2, so I went with #1 (after a little bit of sharpening). Thanks.Ferrylodge (talk) 21:09, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, I didn't do any sharpening as I didn't think it would be much of an improvement. Would you like any of the above versions kept or should I delete them? Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:01, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help and suggestions. I did a crop that is sort of a compromise between #1 and #2, and uploaded it, so I think we're all set now. The extras can be deleted, I think, unless you think the image now at Sara Palin can be substantially improved. Cheers.Ferrylodge (talk) 22:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The new version is a good compromise. There are plenty of images of Palin on Commons, and I don't think these work-in-progress versions are necessary; that's why I uploaded them locally in the first place. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(undent)Fvasconcellos, an editor has created another image that he thinks is better, though I disagree. What do you think? I've inserted the two images side by side (the one on the right is the current image in the article, as I write this).Ferrylodge (talk) 03:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The subject's shirt is so black in Jossi's image that you can't see the folds and wrinkles. The colors in the background are so bright they look like neon. I'm not convinced that the image on the right can be improved, but surely a compromise would be better than the image on the left.Ferrylodge (talk) 05:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In all fairness, I do think it is a bit excessive, but the white balance has improved, and I can see still see the detail of her shirt just fine. Are you sure it's not your monitor?
I actually did do some color correction myself but decided against uploading the version because (as with the sharpening) I didn't think it was a real improvement. I said it above, and I'll say it again: this image is certainly not the best in terms of quality. Let's just try not to make this an issue, shall we? The article has seen more than enough of those as it is... Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the color saturation is excessive. It is also dark and has lost detail. I have worked on this image in Photoshop and have other versions with more subtle corrections that look better. IP7575.25.28.167 (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To whoever does this one, it's currently used in an imagemap. The source is in the article, of course that can be redone fairly easily so maybe no worries. §hep • ¡Talk to me!18:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: These are "Fair use" images. Vectorising them violates the fair use requirement for a low resolution copy since vector can be upscaled to any resolution. They will be deleted. Sorry, no can do. Dhatfield (talk) 15:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's excellent. Well done. Is it possible to add the the curved arrow next to number 1 or is that too complicated for an SVG? Thisglad (talk) 07:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I was reading the FP review for the original image, and there was some question of whether or not the arrow should be there. Either way, hows that? --pbroks13talk?07:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to add it... but I got really frustrated at is (because the lighting wasnt working for me), so I left it out. Do you think it is really needed? --pbroks13talk?04:52, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for adding that, I'm also not sure how needed that arrow is but felt that others might object to the difference. Can you add a shadow to svg similar to the shadow in the PNG? Thisglad (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One way of getting four differently-coloured regions to each border one another
Another way of doing the same thing
Article(s): List of sets of countries that border one another
Request: These two images are fine, but we could do with a third to represent a third way of drawing shapes such that you can get four colours to border one another (per four colour theorem. That is, a circle split in to two differently-coloured regions horizontally, entirely contained within a concentric circle which is split into two differently-coloured regions vertically - similar to the two images we've got already but formed differently. It's far easier to get the concept across in an image than in text as you can perhaps tell.
If possible, it'd be quite useful if the remaining maps could be made as well, per the style used on that article for the examples cited. Thanks, Pfainuktalk18:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That colour scheme is used throughout the article, and I'd prefer to have it consistent, so yeah, same colours please. It would probably be clearer if we had yellow (cyan, orange, whathaveyou) instead of magenta throughout the article, but I don't think it's a big deal. Thanks, Pfainuktalk17:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: I agree that they're low quality and perhaps these should be SVG-ified, but I'll just mention that the images were created using Orbital Viewer which outputs to "TIFF, PPM, BMP, AVI, and VRML files." Also, it's Windows-only. So you won't be able to use the same source to generate the images.— ʞɔıu13:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did the series, but I don't have the time to scale & composite them, add text & make backgrounds transparent. Please will someone pick up from here. Note that the name format is [orbital][N]M[Mcode].png where orbital is S, P, D or F; N is 1 to 7 and M is 0, -1 to 1, -2 to 2 or -3 to 3, depending on orbital. A selection of renders are shown here but I didn't want to spam 44 images to the Lab so the full gallery can be found at User:Dhatfield/Sandbox2. Dhatfield (talk) 03:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Our current logo is not an accurate representation of the official logo and I was told to "sofixit". I was wondering if one of the gurus here could help? Here's what we have now: Image:OSU.svg and it needs to be: http://afrotc.osu.edu/common/home_osu.gif
The background needs to be:
PANTONE 200
or
CMYK: four-color process formula:
0 cyan
100 magenta
65 yellow
15 black
or
Hexadecimal: #990000 or RGB values: 153, 0, 0 Thanks! §hep • ¡Talk to me!21:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: Honestly? Use the logo provided by the university, under fair use if necessary. Whoever made the SVG version did a great job, but it's just not accurate enough; the visual integrity of a logo is sacred! Color is not the only issue: the O in OHIO, for instance, has much more severe oblique stress in the actual logo (that is, the "axis" of the O is tilted much farther to the left; the stroke of the letter is thickest at the bottom left and top right), and the SVG's T · H · E and UNIVERSITY don't match the original—they should be set in Palatino, not hand-drawn. See if you can spot the difference in the "R". Fvasconcellos (t·c) 15:14, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Please can someone improve on this. The present version is something I knocked up in paint (only thing I had and can use!) as the article was badly needing a map to help explain the situation - Dumelow (talk) 20:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then again, I could do it :) I added some detail on the gunfire and damage - if you don't want it I can easily take it out. Any further detail you would like can be added relatively easily. Cheers and best of luck with the FAC. Dhatfield (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Opinion: I extracted the above from the PDFs, I can't get InkScape to snap the boundaries to the image though. (HELP welcomed with a cookie!) But is this generally what you wanted? §hep • ¡Talk to me!00:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It won't work with this one for me. I have some cracked-out InkScape that won't minimize and only unfreezes when it wants to. If you could do it, feel free to overwrite. §hep • ¡Talk to me!02:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I just saw this one, I took the liberty of cleaning up all the dust, scratches and other damage as well and uploaded it over the last edit. Please revert it if you don't prefer it. Mfield (talk) 01:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In GIMP, with the Curves tool. After increasing contrast in the image as a whole, I masked the parsley and worked on the Green channel (again, with Curves) and did a tiny bit of sharpening. Have a look over here for some information on how to use the Curves tool. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: The task here is really simple, but in order to avoid redundant uploads, do you want it to be overwritten to the existing file?--Demoeconomist (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's better to upload it under a different name since it's currently used outside en.wiki as well and they might not want it in red. /Lokal_Profil20:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since Demoeconomist has volunteered to do the job I'll leave it up to them. But I was wondering if you've(Chris) ever downloaded InkScape. Something like this takes two clicks to complete. §hep • ¡Talk to me!01:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A color change doesn't need a vector editor such as Inkscape, by the way. Just open the file in any text editor, find the hex value of the color you want to change and change it :) In this case, #000000 would become #e34234; save it, upload it, and you're home free. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:29, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded under a new name. It's easier for each project to itself decide which version it wants to use, replacement withing en.wiki can be easily done through templates or using AWB. /Lokal_Profil14:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Something seems to be up with the thumbnails. They can be manually without problem [3] but don't seem to be updating correctly. The image itself works though (as can be seen from the generated thumb) and was displaying not to long ago./Lokal_Profil15:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion:
Do you have a higher-quality version of that image? Right now it's so small that any work on it's going to look bad. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 19:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can get a very high-quality version here at the same site, but I'm not sure if I may upload it to commons, because the webpage, where I find the current version at commons as thumbnail, determines as copyright:
At commons, the license is public domain because the copyright expired. However, the copyright of the image belongs to "Victoria and Albert Museum 2002". If you are sure, you could upload the bigger version, but if it's a copyright violation, the current version should also be replaced to a redrawing or a free picture available anywhere else.--Demoeconomist (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
License of a reproduction of two-dimensional public domain work is public domain. It is not important who took the photography. I am almost sure that the same policy applies the frame because a photography of a frame cannot be counted as a work with a lot of originality. I have uploaded the image in full resolution. --pabouk (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: This map (on Commons) shows the location of this city within its county, but somehow the uploader highlighted the wrong county on the state map. Could someone with SVG editing tools un-highlight the highlighted county and instead highlight the correct one? Refer to this map (which also highlights the correct county) if you get confused about which places should be highlighted. Nyttend (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! Many thanks : quickly done and well done. This being a clear/obvious improvement, can you simply upload it over the 1st one. Have just one image name will ease everybody work. Yug(talk)17:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can do that if you like, but usually I like to keep the unaltered work and the retouched versions separate. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 17:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SVG rendering problems
Resolved
I took Image:Graph of 60-fullerene w-nodes.svg and made a new version using Inkscape to correct a small error. The new version fails to render or to produce thumbnails, although I can open it with no problems using Inkscape and Firefox. The strange thing is that after reverting to the original version (which used to work), it also fails to render! Is this some new bug? --Itub (talk) 11:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's odd, looks like the wiki software was different when the thumbnails were first generated, and after an update or modification it is no longer capable of generating them. Jackaranga (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pardon, isn't it already left-aligned? If you have (because of a browser etc.) a special issue to fix, could you describe the object which needs to be fixed or fix that on yourself?--Demoeconomist (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean is that the texts "Deutsche" and "engl" aren't aligned (similar for "German" and "English" in the translated version). I'll try to fix it. /Lokal_Profil13:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: This icon needs converting into .svg, badly. Please help. If it's done quickly, it'll remain eligible for DYK, and the universal edit button is something that really could do with some widespread awareness and support, as it is an awesome idea. Thanks. fish&karate07:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion:
Shouldn't be hard to SVGify, but I'm somewhat concerned about the uncertain attribution chain. Someone really ought to ask John Abbe whether they drew it, or if not, who did, and whether they have a vector version. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've created both a En and a Pt version of these files. However... the text is being rendered funny and is spilling off the edge to the right. I'm not sure whats going on. It looks ok when I render the SVG file directly, but when mediawiki convers it to a PNG for display it gets mucked up. I am most confused. I'm going to keep working on it, but if anyone knows a way to save the file so it renders right I'm all ears! ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 22:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: SVG-ification/Vectorisation? This is the best copy of the arms I can find online, but it really doesn't do Wikipedia justice, and really needs redrawing. As the arms are not clear, the official description is as follows:
ARMS: Or five Pellets between two Bendlets engrailed the whole between as many Mascles Sable.
CREST: On a Wreath of the Colours in front of the Trunk of a Tree eradicated fessewise and sprouting to the dexter a Falcon rising proper each wing charged with a Pellet and holding in the beak a Sprig of Oak also proper three Mascles interlaced Or.
Okay, so it's by far from perfect, but it's really the best I could do, considering the source image wasn't exactly the best quality. Will that do for you? --pbroks13talk?02:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the mantling and helm/crest is a little off, but the sheild is very good. If I'm honest I'd still be reluctant to use it; as Lokal Profil says, it may tresspass on the copyright in its current form. --Jza84 | Talk 19:21, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion:I Retouched the image (new Image); removed border, adjusted color and made the background transparent, I didn't know how i can rename it so i uploded a new file, if it is ok you can request to the delete first one. I copied licensing information from old image please update them if it is necessary. ■ MMXXtalk18:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Graphist opinion: I just gave it a quick go and I am not really convinced the results will be worth it. The images are not well aligned and the +3ev (lighter) one has a color cast and washout from the blown sky which is running all into the bridge shadow area. I can post the best I can do if you want? Mfield (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Since at least three people are interested in seeing this, would it be possible to please post the "quick go" version so we can all see what it looks like? Ruhrfisch><>°°18:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the two quick edits. (The framing on the files is slightly different to the originals as I used a stitcher to align the two files on top of each other and straighten them which then necessitated a crop). The first edit is a basic rescue of the 0ev original single file using the Photoshop shadow/highlight tool followed by some noise reduction and local contrast enhancement. The second is a PS HDR merge of both the original files (both having been aligned first by the stitching app and then I removed the blue cast from the +3 image with a color balance adjustment). They were merged to HDR with Photoshop's HDR automation rather than any more fancy third party method. The blue sky was then blended in. The images wouldn't align completely - probably due to low contrast and me not spending enough time on it - so there is some slight ghosting in the HDR version.
As I said before, these are both c. 5 minute edits, if there was more to work with, say a -2 frame with the sky and trees intact, and the +3 exposure wasn't so blown out then with 20 mins (of more careful work than my quick blast) the output would look a lot better. Mfield (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Could you please shape them up a bit and refine them so that it looks like a 3-dimensional medallion and that the Ω symbol looks like it was not sloppily drawn? BlueCaper (talk) 19:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Translation to portuguese. I got the spanish version here to save work for you guys. Some names are the same and others just need a change of a letter. Please! Thank you in advance!!! Indech (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Box: "Ruta de invasión de Aníbal (Siglo III a.C.)" to "Rota de invasão de Aníbal (Século III a.C.)", "Ruta de Aníbal" to "Rota de Aníbal" and "Batallas principales" to "Batalhas principais"
Scale "millas" to "milhas"
Names: Tajo to Tejo, Duero to Douro, Iberia to Hispânia, Pirineos to Pirineus, Galia to Gália, Marsella to Marselha, Mar Jónico to Mar Jônico, Mar Mediterráneo to Mar Mediterrâneo, Islas Baleares to Ilhas Baleares, Córcega to Córsega, Cerdeña to Sardenha, Danubio to Danúbio, Iliria to Ilíria, Numidia to Numídia and Mauritania to Mauritânia.
Hi, I'm really sorry I didn't get back on you. After I made a request, I gave a shot, downloaded Inkscape, learned how to use it and edited the svg myself. But thank you anyway for the attention and reply. And thank you for indirectly presenting to Inkscape, such a nice software (I was this close to buying CorelDraw, but it's so expensive...). Indech (talk) 23:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: In the revision history, there are two variants-a red one and a silver one. Please merge them so that they have the dimensions and the texture of the silver one, and the coloration of the red one. Thanks. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That is stunning work, truly. Some of the best work I have seen ever. Two quick things-can you remove the outside shading (from both the svg and the jpg), and can you make the horse and rider larger within the center, like the other two? Thank you so much! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm no expert, but it looks to me that it would be more faithful to the original picture to take the "inside" of the middle picture, with the "outside" of the picture on the right. Headbomb {ταλκ – WP Physics: PotW} 18:05, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Hi: Could someone improve this photograph so that it focuses more on him explicating. The photograph is too wide at the moment. Not a portrait, please, but rather a close-up of him explicating at the podium. Let me know if further explication is needed. Sincerely, Manhattan Samurai (talk) 06:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That's perfect. I'm putting it in the article. I'm glad to see on your user page that you are helping out with the photography in the Commons. I look forward to coming across several of your photographs of perhaps California.Manhattan Samurai (talk) 08:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Hopefully this will be really really easy! I could do it myself if I didn't keep getting error messages about insufficient memory. The LOC has two versions of this amazing historical map, one a composite version (a 25mb jp2 which I could open, convert and upload, see above), and one a non-composite version (which was a 75mb jp2 that my computer cannot open, sad). Can someone go to http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g3200.ct000725C , download the map on the right, downsample/compress it so it's under the 20mb limit, and upload it to the commons? This is up at FPC but right now voters don't like the compositeness of it. Thanks!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and a bonus - could you also upload 20mb versions of each of the 12 sheets, so that if viewers want even more detail (this map is GINORMOUS) they can look at those? Thanks!! Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I managed to open the file, and I made Image:Waldseemuller map 2.jpg, I hope this is what you meant. I also saved the whole file as jpeg with 100% quality, the filesize is 87MB though, so I can't do much with it using normal image manipulation software (uncompressed size is around 2GB). Jackaranga (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Request: There is something wrong with the image. The Millennium Line stations, Sapperton and Braid, are switched, so I need it to be switched back to their original positions. Thanks. -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c]20:09, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think you need to force a reload. The link you just gave me shows Braid above Sapperton, same as the one I gave you and same as what I edited the file to be and then uploaded it over the old.?! Mfield (talk) 07:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]