The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to non-free -FASTILY 06:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilson Coleman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia3 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not PD in the US until 2034 as a 1938 image published abroad that was still in copyright at the URAA restoration date in the UK. Felix QW (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could probably be converted to non-free use at Wilson Coleman, unless a truly free image can be found. Felix QW (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for comments on conversion to non-free usage.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarification: I have not found a free image and would be happy with non-free use here. Felix QW (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fire & Movement magazine, 10th anniversary edition, number 49, July-Aug 1986, cover page, Trial of Strength.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Volrath2002 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The image is not in the public domain in Australia as it was published after 1980. — Ирука¹³ 18:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Australian copyright tag is clearly bogus, but it seems that this is actually a US publication, which would indeed be in the public domain if it had not been registered with the copyright office and did not contain a copyright notice. While the file description claims that there is no copyright notice, the scans available as previews here suggest that they did at least initially have a copyright notice, so I am not sure I believe the claim on the file description page without any evidence that the uploader has actually seen an entire copy. Felix QW (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louis X of France (1289 – 1316).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gennarous (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The image does not have any data to indicate its licensing status. — Ирука¹³ 18:54, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another derivative of the same original seems to be available here, where it is credited to the French engraver Lavallee, fl. 1776-1825. So clearly in the public domain. It is orphaned, and I do think it is poor quality and inferior to many of the other options in c:Category:Louis X of France in art, but I suppose it is not a clear duplicate of any of them. Felix QW (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:CantZ506.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The date of publication of the image is unknown, and there is no indirect evidence about this. = licensing status in the US is indeterminable. — Ирука¹³ 19:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.