The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poornima indrajith.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dhwani Wiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The picture is obviously taken by Poornima Indrajith herself and it does not appear to have been uploaded by her. Most probably poached from one of her social media page Jupitus Smart 03:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 05:51, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Cats Paw.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyberia3 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is taken from a US film, so its first publication would be the US rather than the UK. If anyone has an easier way to check film renewals than trawling through PDF scans, it could be worth looking up the renewal records to check whether this motion picture is in the public domain due to non-renewal; otherwise, I doubt this image would satisfy the non-free content criteria. Felix QW (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:PulcinellaGuitar.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gennarous (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source link looks like "http://napolibella.bravepages.com/Riproduzioni/Martucci%20Antonio/Pulcinella.jpg". The artist with that name was born in 1934 and is probably still alive. — Ирука¹³ 12:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto frank physiologist.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Adh30 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source given is a scientific journal article from 2009. The author of that article is given as Author of the image. This is clearly nonsense since the person in the picture, Otto Frank, died 1944. So the picture must be from that year or earlier. Even if it was him, the article has copyright: International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. But it seems that the author of the article just found the image somewhere and copied it without permission. No clue how this could have been published here under a CC license. I wish we could keep it, but I don't think so. Skopien (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an expert on copyright but the relevant article states:

Rights and permissions Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. so my understanding is that the copyright doesn't belong to International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. The author or his institution will have paid for the CC licence. I suppose it's possible that the photograph was the property of the author of the article. Adh (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the Open Access license would not be of much help since we do not accept non-commercial licenses on Wikipedia. However, it is very unlikely that the author of the article is the copyright holder of this image. Tineye finds a more complete version as an autograph card, so we can be pretty sure that it would be published in the sense of American law. Unfortunately, we have nothing to indicate that it has been published more than 95 years ago, so this does not show that the image is now in the public domain in the US. Felix QW (talk) 17:23, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The image looks very similar to https://beckerarchives.wustl.edu/VC090-i090110 although cut down. If this is correct it implies that it may have been published in 1940. Adh (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great find! That's certainly it, which unfortunately makes this image copyrighted in the US until 2036. Felix QW (talk) 13:28, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No proper earlier publication date provided to evaluate copyright. Whpq (talk) 03:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Da Barbiano at Venice.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by FarSouthNavy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

There is no evidence that the photo was published before 1989. — Ирука¹³ 15:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ship was sunk at the Battle of Cape Bon, 13 December 1941, as time travel hasn't been invented, common sense would suggest publication before 1989. Picture itself was taken July 18, 1934. WCM_email 07:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your common sense. My common sense says that the photo lay in the archives until 1991. — Ирука¹³ 09:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And of course you have evidence that is the case? Please share. [1] The ultimate source of that picture is the Italian Defence Ministry. And whilst it is a crap website, google confirms that is the case. I don't see any reason to delete here. WCM_email 13:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no evidence. And you have no evidence. Information without evidence remains outside of Wikipedia.

I don’t understand what you are trying to prove by providing a link to the main page of the Italian Defence Ministry. — Ирука¹³ 13:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So your nomination has no basis, just your suspicions? [2] That image was posted on the defence ministry website, I told you how to find it. WCM_email 14:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my nomination "has no basis". Just like the file has no basis to be on en-Wikipedia.

Okay, the photo was posted on the defence ministry website, and? — Ирука¹³ 14:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A photograph from 1934 has every right to be used on Wikipedia, this is a nomination without any value. I note the original poor quality print was overwritten by you only 3 days ago. I'm done here, this should be a speedy close as keep. WCM_email 15:16, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:CuidadoMujeres1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

File:CuidadoMujeres2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dr. Blofeld (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A screenshot from a film goes into the public domain under different rules than a photograph. — Ирука¹³ 16:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.