< May 11 May 13 >

May 12

[edit]

File:GirlMorph.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:GirlMorph.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gujamin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused personal photo. No obvious use as well. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gisela show.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gisela show.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rodrigopo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work. No metadata, low-res, uploads have varying sizes. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gise 6gala.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gise 6gala.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rodrigopo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work. No metadata, low-res, uploads have varying sizes. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gise showdelossueños.png

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gise showdelossueños.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rodrigopo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work. No metadata, low-res, uploads have varying sizes. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gisela valcarcel conf.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 14:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gisela valcarcel conf.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rodrigopo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Doubtful own work. No metadata, low-res, uploads have varying sizes. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Laguna beach.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The evidence presented by Alexis Jazz is pretty damning, making this at minimum lacking evidence of permission. -FASTILY 00:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laguna beach.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sugarboogy phalanx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The summary says "by Sean Kelly, Picture taken of Laguna Beach - Main Beach at sunset, Sunday, August 6th, 2006. Picture taken with Sony Cybershot DSC T1". It's not quite clear to me, did they enter that name for attribution purposes or is it copyvio? I found it posted on Facebook in 2018, this doesn't prove copyvio as our image was uploaded 21:45, 8 August 2006. The facebook account claims to be a wedding photographer though, and the gmail address associated with the Facebook account is "manishgoswamijpr" which doesn't sound like "Sean Kelly" or "Sugarboogy phalanx".

According to the EXIF it was taken at 18:37, 6 August 2006. Given that it was uploaded quite shortly after being taken and >2MB in size with EXIF in 2006, it seems somewhat less plausible the uploader ripped it from some website as especially in 2006 that would have likely been compressed. (2MB over dial-up would take about 8 minutes) That would make the FB account most likely a hack, unless Sean Kelly/Sugarboogy phalanx/manishgoswamijpr are all the same person. Maybe the location could help. Laguna Beach is in California. The FB photographer is in.. strangely doesn't even list a location, why would you hire a photographer if you don't even know where they are? Reviews appear to come from Sri Lanka, Tunisia, India and Malaysia. Maybe the FB photographer just is a hack. They've only uploaded 6 photos anyway, what kind of photographer does that? As another option, maybe our uploader got the image from a family member or something (hence the "by Sean Kelly" line) and the FB photographer is an entirely unrelated hack.

Far too long of a story for a single photo. I'm still on the fence. Any thoughts? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Holden (2019).svg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holden (2019).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ridwan97 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Pretty sure this logo is above the threshold of originality. Fair use will have to be decided on a case-by-case basis as the logo is currently used on three articles. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. New logo for Holden uploaded to File:Holden (car brand).webp. 2022 New Zealand Rally Championship and 2018 Supercars Championship don't really need it. Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 23:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.