The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABSC Vasco.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AmadoMac (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free student council image. Although there is a section on the student council, this image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary and its removal is not detrimental to the understanding of the topic. Whpq (talk) 01:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:QuasquicentennialEmblem.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AmadoMac (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free logo is attributed to the UST Philets and Artlets Alumni Association, Inc and not the University of Santo Tomas Faculty of Arts and Letters. The stated purpose of "For promotion and to identify details of the emblem" is vague. As an identifier for the faculty, this is not appropriate as it appears to be some some sort of emblem for an anniversary celebration (Life Love Lore 1896 - 2021) nor is it the subject of any sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Totolozano mdsqsc.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AmadoMac (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free image of an award presentation. The image is not needed to understand that a posthumous award was given as that is already identified in the text. The removal of this image would not detract from that understanding. Fails WP:NFCC#1, and WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 01:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "File_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put the name of the uploader just after "Uploader=", and your reason just after "Reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:FFD or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Error: You must replace File_name.ext with the actual name of the file you are nominating for deletion when using ((subst:ffd2)). PooleParty247 (talk) 02:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raysastrophotograhy (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by User:Raysastrophotograhy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

image is unencyclopedic PooleParty247 (talk) 02:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosette Nebula NGC 2244.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) PooleParty247 (talk) 02:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raysastrophotograhy (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by User:Raysastrophotograhy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

image is unencyclopedic PooleParty247 (talk) 02:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:This shows the bond of Silicon Oxide using the Bohr model.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by $200inaire (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Inaccurate molecular model: The individual molecule is linear and exists only under extreme conditions. There are 2 valence electrons too many. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:02, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.