The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Uploader claims to own the copyright, and appears to be the subject of the photo. EXIF data seems to indicate the copyright is held by www.aestheticimages.net so WP:OTRS confirmation of copyright status would be needed. Whpq (talk) 03:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:35, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Useless selfie. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:38, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
The poster is used in the background section of Zar je važno da l' se peva ili pjeva... World Tour. The image fails WP:NFCC#3a since the poster in the infobox already illustrates the article and there is no critical commentary of the image itself in the article, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 05:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
The source given does not prove that this is the logo of the school. The Banner talk 11:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
https://freerangestock.com/licensing.php indicates that most Freerangestock images are under an incompatible license. It states that there are some CC0 images hosted there, but I can't see any indication on the image page that this image is CC0. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
You cannot sell, redistribute, or relicense the images, and you cannot sell products which derive their primary value from the image.This restriction does not meet the Wikipedia definition of free content because that definition requires licenses to
not bear copyright restrictions on the right to redistribute, study, modify and improve, or otherwise use works for any purpose in any medium, even commercially.The license directly contradicts the non-free content guidelines and is therefore incompatible with Wikipedia. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2019 (UTC)