< May 25 May 27 >

May 26

[edit]

File:Pallywood cover.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pallywood cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jaakobou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid fair use rationale: a non-free media cover in an article not about the film. In any case, even with a FUR, would fail contextual significance and the omission of the image would not be detrimental to understanding. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dimitrios Pagourtzis booking photo.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 5. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitrios Pagourtzis booking photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amy Bishop booking photo.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 08:08, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amy Bishop booking photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dystopos (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per precedent (1, 2, 3), the use of a non-free image of the shooter in an article about the shooting incident, as opposed to an article about the biography of the shooter, violates WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not increase the understanding of the shooting, nor would its removal be detrimental to that understanding. xplicit 02:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aneurinbevan.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 22:12, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aneurinbevan.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is copyright marked ay NPG and is identified as being from Elliott & Fry-not unknown. We hope (talk) 03:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panglong Conference.jpg PD photo this one replaced. We hope (talk) 03:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Elliot & Fry Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 07:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Elliott & Fry died in 1903 & 1897 respectively and Elliot & Fry ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arthurbottomley.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthurbottomley.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright marks and identified as being from Elliott & Fry-not unknown. We hope (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the photographer is unknown as Elliot & Fry Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 07:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Elliott & Fry died in 1903 & 1897 respectively and Elliot & Fry ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baronharlech.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baronharlech.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is copyright marked at NPG and the photographer is identified as Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:William Ormsby-Gore 1936.jpg PD photo it replaced. We hope (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Marquesszetland.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marquesszetland.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is identified as from Bassano Ltd. at NPG-it's not unknown. We hope (talk) 14:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2nd Marquess of Zetland.JPG PD photo it replaced. We hope (talk) 14:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richardcrossman.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richardcrossman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is copyright marked at NPG with identification of Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this photo as non-free as person is deceased and we have no PD photo. We hope (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LordFaringdon.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LordFaringdon.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is copyright marked at NPG and identified as being from Elliott & Fry; not unknown. We hope (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD images for this deceased person. We hope (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Elliot & Fry Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Elliott & Fry died in 1903 & 1897 respectively and Elliot & Fry ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordhertford.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lordhertford.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is copyright marked at NPG and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD photo of the deceased person. We hope (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years.
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:23, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walterrunciman.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walterrunciman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at PNG with copyright notation and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown We hope (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:1905 Walter Runciman.jpg PD photo replaced by this. We hope (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordplymout.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lordplymout.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notation and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD photo of this deceased person. We hope (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years.
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Williammorrisson.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Williammorrisson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notations and identified as being from Bassano LTd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Dunrossil-02.jpg PD file this replaced. We hope (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years.
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Walterwomersley.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walterwomersley.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notations and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD photo of the deceased person. We hope (talk) 15:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See listing below. We hope (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kennethmartinlindsey.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kennethmartinlindsey.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notations and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD photo of this deceased person. We hope (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 14:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lordfeversham.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lordfeversham.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notations and identified as being from Bassano Ltd.-not unknown. We hope (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can support re-license of this as non-free as we have no PD photo of this deceased person. We hope (talk) 15:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See the reply above re: the Alexander Bassano photo. We hope (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hughgaitskell.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hughgaitskell.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo has copyright notice at NPG and was taken by Bassano LTD, as per the NPG page. Invalid license re: author unknown. We hope (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hugh Gaitskell 1958.jpg PD photo which this replaced. We hope (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rabbutler.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabbutler.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Portrait is listed with copyright notice at NPG-page clearly shows it was taken by Bassano LTD-author is not unknown. We hope (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rab Butler.png PD photo this replaced. We hope (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Christopher-Birdwood.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christopher-Birdwood.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Portrait has copyright notice at NPG and is clearly marked that Bassano Ltd is the photographer; author is not unknown. We hope (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:1917.01.07 Le Miroir - Atasatul militar britanicla Bucuresti lt col Thompson.png PD photo this one replaced. We hope (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Malcolmmacdonald.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malcolmmacdonald.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notice and is clearly labeled with Bassano Ltd. as the photographer-not unknown. We hope (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Malcolm MacDonald cropped.jpg PD photo this one replaced. We hope (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richardstokes.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richardstokes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notice and the photographer is clearly states as Bassano Ltd-not unknown. We hope (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arthurjones.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arthurjones.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notice and identifies Bassano Ltd. as the photographer-not unknown. We hope (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would support a re-license of this as there's no photo of this deceased person. We hope (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Photographer is unknown and was taken before 1948, meaning it can be released under the licence of PD-UK-unknown. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 07:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emanuelshinwell.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 23:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emanuelshinwell.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JimmyJoe87 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Invalid license. Photo is at NPG with copyright notice. Photographer is listed as Bassano Ltd-not unknown. We hope (talk) 23:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the photographer is unknown as Bassano Ltd is the company name, not the person who took it. Therefore the photo can be used under PD-UK-unknown as it was taken before 1948. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Emanuel Shinwel HU 059765 (crop).jpg PD photo this one replaced. We hope (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Photographer is unknown and was taken before 1948, meaning it can be released under the licence of PD-UK-unknown. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 01:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore Alexander Bassano died in 1913 and Bassano Ltd ceased to exist in 1962 so there is no possible way for us to find out who the respective photographer for this photograph is or was and that is why it is allowed under the licence of PD-UK-unknown JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alexander Bassano - self portrait.jpg The photo was taken in the 1890s and the person died in 1913. The license shows author's life + 100 years. It was uploaded in 2017. The file at Commons isn't complete, however. The file shows that a vaid US copyright tag is needed and that would be one for PD-pre 1923. It's not licensed as PD-unknown but author's life + 100 years. We hope (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm confused as to what relevance this has? We know that Alexander Bassano took that photo himself, since its a self portrait, but we have no idea who took the photo of the person in question here, since the company ceased to exist in 1962 and we know it wasn't Bassano himself since he was already dead. JimmyJoe87 (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 17:59, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luis Miguel Soundtrack.jpg

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Historical precedent is that we don't allow such an use of images. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luis Miguel Soundtrack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Philip J Fry (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC as the image is very similar to that of File:Luis Miguel póster.jpg. WP:FILM, WP:ALBUMS, and WP:SONGS recommend to avoid repetitive images, WP:TV should do the same. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 22:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC) © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 22:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.