The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:FlagofFriuli.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheWhiteRussian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 02:26, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:EnterpriseDB corporate logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RenDag (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The file was transferred to Commons but with a better quality image. This title ("File:EnterpriseDB corporate logo.png") is shadowing that of Commons and there is nothing to be kept here, not even the file. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 04:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete local file, lower quality version serving no purpose. Salavat (talk) 01:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Looks like an uncontroversial case. —Codename Lisa (talk) 11:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not enough for copyright in the US, although it would be in some other countries. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:44, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dominick's Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Referral on threshold of originality grounds, given the stylized underlining of k's portion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Not enough for copyright in the US. Even caligraphy isn't enough in the US, and that's highly stylized. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holiday Inn Logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Connormah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Refferal on threshold of originality grounds ( Stylized H). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gold 1929.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dellhpapple (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The screenshot was used to be used in the plot section of Gold Diggers of Broadway against WP:FILMNFI in that the plot section describes the film and is not critical commentary of the image itself, but was recently moved into the cast section where there is there is no critical commentary about it thereby failing WP:NFCC#8 because it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film. Aspects (talk) 05:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Aspects:: What about now? I just stumbled across this article, saw the discussion, and decided it could be used critically in discussing the early use of the Technicolor process. -- Zanimum (talk) 13:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Zanimum, per WP:NFCC#8 (no contextual significance), there needs to be something about the prose that justifies the need for a non-free image. If the image was discussed as emblematic of the Technicolor process, you'd have a stronger case. I'd close this discussion as close, but am giving it a courtesy relist for lack of feedback.  czar 09:21, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hold for a sec, querying ((PD-US-no renewal)) status. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:02, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, sadly. This was renewed in 1957, so the movie will remain copyrighted until 2024. I had hoped the studio hadn't bothered to renew on a now-lost film. Fails WP:NFCC#8, as the relationship between this specific image and the Technicolor context is unclear. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 22#File:Dia3.jpg))

File:Dia3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ime-tpoo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 22#File:Dia1.jpg))

File:Dia1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ime-tpoo (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from everything but the Disney Channel article per WP:NFC#UUI #17 ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Disney Channel 2014.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by KamranMackey (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails WP:NFCC#8 (WP:NFC#UUI§17) in all articles except for Disney Channel. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing wrong with the image. It's been on Wikipedia since 2015 and I explicitly state that the image is only used on Disney Channel. So IMHO the image should be kept. Kamran Mackey (talk) 21:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KamranMackey, this is files for discussion, not deletion. I, too, want the image to be kept, but only in the article Disney Channel. Currently it's used in more than a dozen other articles and this discussion is to determine whether those uses are acceptable or not. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:40, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.