The result of the discussion was: delete. Article deleted as WP:G11, so non-free use is no longer relevant/possible. ~ Rob13Talk 02:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader owns the copyright on this. Needs proof of permission from the organization or be should be converted to fair use. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Doesn't meet WP:NFCC#1 because an alternative logo is currently in-use on the relevant article. ~ Rob13Talk 02:15, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader owns the copyright on this. Needs proof of permission from the Iran Compress Industrial Group or be should be converted to fair use. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millenium Park Fountain people.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Millenium Park Fountain 2.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. The rationale applies to all three articles where the image appears. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
"significantly increase readers' understanding"of who we're talking about. I suspect this nomination has less to do with wp policy and more to do with IDONTLIKEIT. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
"significantly increase readers' understanding"? K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused video game screenshot, no foreseeable use FASTILY 08:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Band promotional photo; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:17, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused vanity image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
unused logo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused, possible copyvio (see watermark in bottom right corner) FASTILY 08:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
notable historical photo, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete ~ Rob13Talk 02:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot of a film/movie; dubious self-work claim FASTILY 08:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unclear original publication date, possible derivative of non-free content FASTILY 08:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
unused, low res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:35, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Missing evidence of permission; uploader is not photographer/copyright holder FASTILY 08:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
unused logo, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:37, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned image, not encyclopedic, similar image was deleted in 2014. XeroxKleenex (talk) 09:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Pretty sure that we can get a collage from freely licensed images for Porterville, California, meaning that this one violates WP:NFCC#1. Now maybe the images in the collage themselves are freely licensed but we'd need evidence for each one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Unused image for a person who had had his article deleted at afd. No foreseeable use Whpq (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)