The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by King of Hearts (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OR, LQ, redundant to and less precise than commons:File:Latineurope.jpg (same file name) anyway Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#3b, WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10b. Stefan2 (talk) 22:24, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UDigits) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC) Also nominating the following for the same reason:[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, uploader's only contribution, no stated source, the half-toning suggests it may be a scan of a copyrighted source Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, dead source (just to the bare image anyways), no reason given that this photo would be public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
user's only contribution, no stated source, publicity-type photo for rock band. i'd delete lacking evidence of permission. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no source for base map, no source for troop movements Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probably a copyright violation of both the underlying julian assange photo and the wikileaks logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no need to have this around - should be represented using plain text and WP:MATH symbols Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, apparent copyright violation Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus This whole deletion discussion seems to turn on whether wpclipart's assertion that they verify that all of their images are public domain is "good enough" for that site to be listed as a source. Besides looking at the discussion here, I've also checked for other deletion discussions linking to wpclipart and for other images linking it as a source, and found little to indicate that anyone has a problem with it either here or on Commons; wpclipart is even linked from Wikipedia:Public domain image resources, which gives some legitimacy. Since I don't see any really compelling "Keep" arguments but the "Delete" arguments are even weaker, I'm just going to close this as "no consensus" with a recommendation to move it over to Commons since it's orphaned here. Anomie⚔ 02:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, clearly based on PD work but i'm not sure that the source site is a reliable indicator of the copyright status of this particular clip art adaptation Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not clear what this is a photo of - possibly copyrighted underlying artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep and add a fair use rationale. — ξxplicit 01:16, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, something published in 1928 in Ireland is not necessarily in the public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no source for chuck norris image Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Undbecks) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to [Undefined]]) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear how this could ever be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not clear why this would be useful, could eaisly be recreated if needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Under the Sun Studios) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (relates to Under the Sun Studios) Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, apparent copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear what this is, too small to be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, out of date, no source for data Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:58, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, seems to be a long research paper in Tamil Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]