The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what the completion status of the building is, but looking at it in person (without my camera), it looks like it has reached full heignt. A current picture can be taken to replace this fair use image. I have been looking for some recent skyline pictures that show the progress, however none seem available on Commons.--kelapstick(bainuu) 02:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 00:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. Merely shows a headshot of a character; not the object of direct commentary; does nothing to make the scene better understood; fails NFCC#8. Generic boilerplate rationale, failing to establish any particular need for this image. Was uploaded as a replacement for File:24 Season 5 Premiere, Splitscreen.jpg, which was uploaded and also nominated for deletion only yesterday. This just goes to show the arbitrariness of these image selections: apparently, one is as good as the other, since their main purpose is not much more than having an image for the sake of having an image. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Overuse of non-free photographs, in an article that already has far more than its fair share of non-free items. Merely shows actors and film team members sitting around in a random behind-the-scenes setting. Doesn't contribute to understanding the article sufficiently to justify the very blatant breach of NFCC#3 (minimality) standards. Claim that it conveys the "relaxed behind the scene image" in ways that could not be adequately covered by text is unconvincing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable hole in a guitarr. Orphaned and no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A blurry cable? No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, blurry and no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 20:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some tubes. Useless? Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person? Unused user photo? Stefan2 (talk) 20:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unused user photo. Stefan2 (talk) 20:58, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]