The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
this image is not discussed in the CD article (it also formerly appeared in the Miles Davis article, where it was even less justified). Fails WP:NFCC8 - does not significantly increase readers' understanding. Just because this image is somehow associated with the record doesn't mean it has to appear in the article about the record Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
this image is unused and there is no evidence as to its usefulness, also it appears to have been uploaded for use in a deleted article(which was deleted in 2007 under CSD A7). gz33 (talk) 02:11, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vector image available. Image not used in article space Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused in articlespace , Vector Version available Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image for which vector image exists Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image , for which a Vector version exists Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image redundant to File:Sotovelez.jpg from which it was cropped. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Kept (IAR non-admin closure, see below) Sven Manguard Wha? 06:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Collage includes component image File:Luis Llorens Torres.JPG which was incorrectly tagged as PD. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:32, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep (IAR non admin close, see below) Sven Manguard Wha? 07:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Collage includes component image File:DeVillard.jpg which was incorrectly tagged as PD. Image also contains CC-By-SA components and so cannot be released under any less restrictive license. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My primary concern is that this photograph contains the images of 20 children under the age of 18, and none of whom (presumptively) have expressed consent for their pictures to be put on the internet. A second reason I'm nominating this is that the article it's being used for is likely going to be deleted per this AfD, which means it will become an unused and useless photo. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: 'Delete as failure of WP:NFCC#2, in particular as represented by WP:NFC#UUI #7 and WP:CSD#F7 #2. Any inability of Getty to restrict the usage of this image elsewhere does not likewise allow us to use it as well without sourced commentary regarding the image itself when it comes to images from press/photo agencies. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:26, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This unreplaceable invaluable non-free photograph belongs to Photo Agency Getty Images and captures a famous moment in the history of football. We are using it to illustrate our article about this famous moment. While this photo is irreplaceable and the perfect illustration for illustrating any discussion about this moment (i.e., it most likely passes NFCC#1 and #8), this is exactly what makes the image so valuable for Getty images, and this is how they make money from this image (that is, licensing it to publications discussing the moment the picture captures). That means, our use, unfortunately, is not fair. It fails WP:NFCC#2. Obs. before voting, please understand NFCC is not multiple choice. Damiens.rf 17:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The value of this photo relies on it documenting the fact that Maradonna did touched the ball with his hand. No matter how much you downscale its resolution, as long as you can see him touching the ball, it's still such a valuable image. --Damiens.rf 06:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image for which better quality vector version exists? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image for which a Vector version is available Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:08, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]