< January 16 | January 18 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Bkell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. Additionally, I strongly recommend that Lihaas read 10 Big Myths about copyright explained, paying extra attention to section #3 (and substitute "social media" for "usenet"). SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep nothing to say it is a copy vio, as it turns out it seems to be social media and that is not copyrighted anywhere. if it can be proven to be a copyvio of someone (who i wouldnt know since its not a BLP), then we can consider it as "illegal" (also note the above comment came on jan 17 when it was already NOT a BLP)(Lihaas (talk) 03:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC));[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:48, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep. I will leave it up to others whether to move to Commons or not. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: delete due to finding of free equivalent. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I drew a circle on that frame from the clip. That wasn't in the video clip. Why do they keep deleting the statement that he was in Who Framed Roger Rabbit? He was in the movie. If it's illegal to include screenshots from Youtube videos, that how should I upload a screenshot from this film? I don't have a DVD of the film. I keep trying to include links to prove this, but those sites I try posting links to were blacklisted. —Mavericker (talk) 6:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]