The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused .png version of File:Bank Millennium Branch Poland.jpg. PNG is too large to be displayed smoothly, uncommon file format for photographs, unlikely to be of use. (JPG version is fine.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The original file from fr.wp was deleted with the following reason (via google translate): " Deleting an image of the category Picture of unknown source since January 2007" Bluemask (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Obsolete. Tagged for low quality and replaced by commons:File:Naphthalene-1,5-disulfonic acid.png DMacks (talk) 10:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphan icetea8 (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Poor quality (resolution/pixelation), and incorrect (per Aluminium borohydride, the title compound is verifiably not a collection of separate ions as the diagram says) DMacks (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot of a school's Web page used to illustrate the article about the school. Fails WP:NFCC#1 because it is potentially replaceable by free content for the purpose it serves (a photo of the school would actually be a lot better than this image). Also fails WP:NFCC#8 because a screenshot of the school's Web page does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the school itself. —Bkell (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First off, this image is essentially (but not 100%) a duplicate of Commons image File:Bedford 2006 63.jpg; there's no reason to have multiple almost-identical images when the local one isn't used. Moreover, this looks as if it's cropped from a Flickr image — it can't be cropped from Flickr because it was uploaded here a year before the date on the Flickr file. It's exceedingly unlikely that two different authors would take identical-looking photos of the same exact subject, so I believe that both this image and the one at Flickr are copied from some third location, making this a copyvio. Nyttend (talk) 21:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]