The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohammed bin Ali.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Mohammed bin Ali.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).

• (({Reason))} Bin Khater (talk) 01:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deloncm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DelonDiscountMoore (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused personal photo (or rater a series of such). Also no license information. Sherool (talk) 07:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused personal photo. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Belvidere2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jonrev (notify | contribs | uploads).

• While the user appears to release the image into the public domain, they also indicate their intention that this is not the case when they say that people may not reuse this image without explicit permission. This user also has a history of not understanding the whole free-content concept. Thus this image should most likely be considered non-free, and thus dispensed with. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete license is wrong, creator did not release photo into the public domain. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - "Do not use without my permission" essentially makes the file non-free. As a non-free file, it is most likely replaceable by a free one and therefore it violates non-free content criteria #1.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demon sfgam.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jonrev (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:50, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unused. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to comons license is compatible. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 06:45, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jonrev (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:52, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Orphaned. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 11:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to comons license is compatible. Pirate ship type ride 76.66.203.138 (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • And blurry and otherwise poor quality. Commons won't be harmed by taking a pass on this one. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.