The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:105th and Euclid in 1981.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Day Street (notify | contribs | uploads).

• badly cropped, almost all white space, no encyc value Skier Dude (talk 02:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into File:The Block.jpg and Rename as File:105th and Euclid in 1981.jpg. The file named "The Block" is an improved version of the same image, but the name is too generic. ----DanTD (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • UPDATE - I just tagged File:The Block.jpg for renaming as "105th and Euclid in 1981," with the note that I'm aware of the page that has the same name. ----DanTD (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:105th and Euclid in 1981v2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Day Street (notify | contribs | uploads).

• badly cropped, almost all white space, no encyc value Skier Dude (talk 02:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is clearly a second attempt to create the image which as of this writing is called "The Block." ----DanTD (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beth Brown artwork 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Richmond biophile (notify | contribs | uploads).

• This piece of artwork is not specifically discussed in the article on the artist. So adding a copyright image of it is not fair use since it does nothing to enhance the readers understanding of the artilce contents Solid State Survivor (talk) 03:53, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Police-Reunion-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by MichaelLinder (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Too blurry to be of use. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I agree this image is pretty LQ, however at the resolution that it is used within the article I think the image forms a visual impression that may be beneficial. However, I think with the image of the band performing just down the page it could be argued fairly that the LQ of this picture combined with the redundancy of the other image make a suitable grounds for deletion even if the circumstances of them playing are different in each photo. Solid State Survivor (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BOA 2007 (247).JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Breber (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons. –xeno^talk 13:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BANDSTLOUIS.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Breber (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons. –xeno^talk 13:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RHSBand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Appraiser (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons. –xeno^talk 13:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damario 4.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Desgrace@earthlink.net (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:N50800090 30416541 2269.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Erebusrat (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit body CD Motagua.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chupu (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Copyright infringement - use of Pepsi logo Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit body CD Motagua home.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chupu (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Copyright infringement - pepsi logo Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit body sanfrecceaway.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ffbear (notify | contribs | uploads).

• copyright infringement - sponsor's logo Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kit body sanfreccehome.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ffbear (notify | contribs | uploads).

• copyright infringement - sponsor's logo Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 15:15, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geutebrück2 ji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kleinrogge (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Image was used in the Jens Geutebrück article which was deleted under some combination of WP:CSD#A7 and hoaxiness. "Out of scope" as they'd say on Commons. Hoaxiness may also cast doubt on license claims. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Even the name isn't the real one - see e.g. 8.8.2009 (last entry on the page) - DELETE Testbed (talk) 14:23, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.