The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:02, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG WorkshopHistory1335.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sarah777 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Copyvio. Sarah777 is the photographer. I am sure that she did not write the text or create the images in this interpretation board. Under English law, it counts as a two-dimensional work of art. The same probably applies under Irish law. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This image records a contemporary 'official' interpretation of the Donaghmore workhouse and its 'meaning'. For that reason the sign is an important artifact in its own right and its photo should be retained. The 're-discovery' in Ireland (in very recent years) of 'closed institutions' is an interesting phenomenon and the subject of an increasing body of academic study. How official agencies (and private trusts etc.) present 'history' to the general public has historical/sociological value. The image of the sign can quite easily be incorporated into the article mentioned without issues of copyvio arising. Please keep. RashersTierney (talk) 11:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - If the nominator is correct with the statement that it is a two dimensional work of art, then it may be public domain due to this.--Rockfang (talk) 10:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Keeping and using this image would be equivalent of quoting the text in the image verbatim, a block quote en masse. Might be swayed if the image was intergal to an article which it is not.KTo288 (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telugu - Visanasola - Kuthsa gothram genealogy - color.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chandruselva (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Not notable Kittybrewster ☎ 08:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:10-cube.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tomruen (notify | contribs | uploads).

• orphaned, svg version exists. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 16:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same is true for File:4-cube.png, File:5-cube.png, File:6-cube.png, File:7-cube.png, File:8-cube.png, File:9-cube.png, SVG versions available. Tom Ruen (talk) 18:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.