The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Cirt (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell (talk) 14:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(This, for instance: Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level heading (=== or lower), as this sometimes disconnects the heading from the text that follows it. This can often be avoided by shifting left-aligned images down a paragraph or two. [emphasis added].)
A valid image doesn't suddently lose its validity and become mere "decoration" by being shifted a tiny amount, it retains that validity because the basic unit of Wikipedia is the article and not the article section. The visual presentation of an article is an important consideration, since it helps the reader's eye be guided through the text. Disruptive images, even if they are valid, disfigure an article and decrease its utility. What Wikipedia needs not just good information, it needs good information, well presented. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 21:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Rjanag (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Not deleted. – Quadell (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]