The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Hot Lilo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ILOVETHEOC (notify | contribs).

• Apparent red carpet publicity shot, claimed to be from personal camera, but lacks the watermarking and additional info that consumer cameras leave Kww (talk) 00:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I have high quality digital camera would you like to me to send you a picture of that as well Kww?!? ILOVETHEOC —Preceding comment was added at 03:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't match the shot, but it's from the premiere of "Georgia Rules" on May 8, 2007. See Wireimage and Xinhuanet.com.Kww (talk) 03:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Reason you can't match the shot BECAUSE IT IS FROM MY CAMERA!!!!!!!! how am I going to make you belive me Kww!!!!! ILOVETHEOC

Ok, can you either (a) provide the uncropped image (even if you don't want to release the uncropped image under the GFDL - if you can just upload it temporarily to flickr or webshots or email it to me to demonstrate that you have it) or (b) email permissions-en@wikimedia.org and give your name, the name of the image you are talking about, a statement that you are the photographer, and a statement that you release the image under the terms of the GFDL. Submissions to permissions-en@wikimedia.org are completely confidential - nothing you send there will be posted online. An agent of the m:OTRS system that handles your email will put a tag on the image with a ticket number indicating they have confirmed the permission. --B (talk) 15:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you choose to do either of these, please leave a brief note here and on the image page. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 17:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: ILOVETHEOC has uploaded non-free replaceable images before which had no licensing info, and has uploaded non-free replaceable images before which were accurately tagged and sourced, but this is the first image he has claimed to have come from his own camera. There is a history of bad uploads, but no history of deception. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Image kept. WP:AGF -Nv8200p talk 14:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:Robert_Rodriguez_directing_Planet_Terror.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ibaranoff24 (notify | contribs).

• WP:NFCC#8 violation. Non-free image of director directing, but it doesn't add important information to the articles it's in. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — Image illustrates the text next to which it appears in the articles it appears in. It is useful and needed. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 14:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Delete. No real informative value.Kww (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Image deleted - fails WP:NFCC #8. Purely decorative -Nv8200p talk 14:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

• Deleted by Maxim. Non-admin closure. Icestorm815 (talk) 01:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Robert_Studio_Pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MylesKarp (notify | contribs).

• Does not provide useful encyclopedic information – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:40, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:

Image:O2bcukeyelogo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hmwith (notify | contribs).

• Unused, apparently incorrect or outdated (see Ohio State University) --Mangostar (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Nope, the template was simply reformatted, which left no place for an image as the name. It is actually correct and up-to-date. The only reason there is no "the" in the Wikipedia name is so it follows the manual of style, where "the" should not be used in these situations (see talk page archives). Anyways, it should be deleted, as it is no longer used, so it has been done, per WP:SPEEDY#G7. нмŵוτнτ 21:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.