Comment. Actually, I think the other image in the Poeke Castle article is much more interesting and dramatic. Both are slightly soft but seem to polish up quite well with a bit of sharpening. Ðiliff«»(Talk)23:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I chosed that because it had more focus on the castle itself. Although, when I think about it, the enviornment has also an important EV. I also like it very much - I'll add it as alt. Tomer T (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt. Still think it needs sharpening and I'd be tempted to upload a sharpened edit over the top but it's already featured elsewhere and I suppose that may tread on people's toes a little. Ðiliff«»(Talk)10:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt stunning photographs, clear EV in illustrating said building. My preference for the alt is from the look of it the moat is omitted from the original in an accidental but slightly misleading way. (if you study it, a moat-type ditch can be inferred.) Thus neutral on original. Grandiose(me, talk, contribs) 20:14, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]