Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2012 at 17:50:41 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Soft... for an image that size I'd expect a bigger file (and hopefully sharper image). Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Good plane image is like this: (see below). MathewTownsend (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying you don't like the composition? The two images are actually very similar... Clegs (talk) 10:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this is also a good plane photograph. Tomer T (talk) 21:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Have you actually tried taking pictures of planes? It's VERY hard to get a plane that's moving 300+ mph perfectly sharp. Good composition and acceptable quality. Clegs (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's an impressive picture, but (per Crisco) the picture is soft and not entirely in focus. Dusty777 17:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support very difficult to take such or similar images. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A little bit soft as mentioned above, but with degree-of-difficulty this is really great. I see no difference in quality between the above and below pictures. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 19:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]