List of accolades received by TV Patrol

List of accolades received by TV Patrol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by TV Patrol/archive1

Nominator(s): Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because its format is almost identical to another one (which is a newscast) with the same class, List of accolades received by 24 Oras. Chompy Ace 21:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• "the newscast's anchors changed significantly during its run" - if it is still being broadcast I would say "the newscast's anchors have changed significantly during its run"
• "Each segment has a unique topic, such as entertainment and weather" => "Each segment has a unique topic, such as entertainment or weather" (current wording could be interpreted as saying that there is a single segment which deals with entertainment and weather, which would be intriguing but I assume doesn't happen :-)
• That's all I got! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChrisTheDude, done. Chompy Ace 23:39, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose — I am objecting to the "Wins 47 / Nominations 97" in the infobox, for reasons I have explained at Template talk:Infobox awards list#Totals should be avoided. Despite some canvassing, I have not received any feedback there, positive or negative. This !vote in the nature of a test case to spur discussion there. Basically, if the template is changed as I suggest then the FL criteria will change. It would be a simple matter to simply remove those two parameters from the infobox on this and other similar articles. jnestorius^(talk) 11:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jnestorius, please strike oppose? This issue has been resolved. Chompy Ace 20:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the issue is not arithmetic; 44/100 is just as arbitrary as 47/97. jnestorius^(talk) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jnestorius, I removed it, so done. Could you please strike oppose or give support? Chompy Ace 12:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, thanks jnestorius^(talk) 14:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from ZooBlazer

• Relatively short in terms of prose, so I didn't find any issues.

Image review - passes

• The logo for the series is the only image used. It has alt text, is properly licensed, and use obviously makes sense in the article.

Great work with the article. Happy to support. -- ZooBlazer 07:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]