The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:35, 28 March 2010 [1].

---

K-os[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

• Featured article candidates/K-os

• Featured article review/K-os/archive1

Toolbox
Analysis Citation bot External links

Notified: Blackjays1, WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Toronto, WikiProject Hip hop, Canadian Wikipedians' notice board

I am nominating the article because I was the one who wrote and nominated it back in 2006. Since then it has barely been updated and I'm shocked that no has caught this yet. I'm a retired wiki user so if anyone wants to notify someone or a project who is willing to get it back in shape be my guest. The article definitely fails at the very least 1a and b and probably 2 as well of the FA criteria. Tut 06:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Media review

• The image licenses are fine, but the song samples are not the subject of critical commentary in the article. The article just says when they were released. There should be discussion of how these songs illustrate his musical style and influences or capture key elements of his performances. DrKiernan (talk) 10:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Needs a major shake up in the source department. Lots of [dead link] and [not in citation given]s, and a third-party link within the text itself. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Featured article criterion of concern are referencing, comprehensiveness for recent developments, media copyright YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:57, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist as lacking in comprehension, also needs way more than just a once-over in the source department. Doesn't feel comprehensive enough either. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 12:17, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist, insufficiently referenced; the "2007–present" is extremely below FA prose standards. No significant work on the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:31, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.