The article was not promoted by Laser brain 20:44, 8 March 2011 [1].
James E. Boyd (scientist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured article because it is a delightfully cited and comprehensive biography. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 19:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, still leaning oppose because it still needs copy-editing/cleanup. Also, referencing format should be more consistent. Looking better, though - keep up the good work! Nikkimaria (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2011 (UTC) Oppose at this time, although I'm open to revisiting once the below issues are addressed.[reply]
((done))
and ((not done))
) is discouraged, as they slow down the page load time." Nikkimaria (talk) 05:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
((citation))
template, where most of the other refs use templates from the cite family. These are just some examples - in general, reference formatting needs careful editing for accuracy and consistency. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments for now, as I'm not convinced this article is sufficiently well-written.
--Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cleaned up. Please read the WP:FAC instructions, do not use done templates, do not amend other editor's posts (add your posts to your own line) and sign your entries. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Disambig/External Link check - No dabs; 1 dead external link (britannica.com). 1 external redirects which may lead to link rot; see it with the tool in the upper right of this page. --PresN 01:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Carcharoth (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]