Tarheel95 (talk · contribs) I would like to know how Im doing as far as editing and reverting and what I can improve in T-95 (talk) 03:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR EDITING SKILLS ASSESSMENT

Just expanding on your nomination for Paul Starling deletion and juxtaposing this with your request for feedback on your editing skills.

1. The nomination as non notable is flawed as per criteria See link below for notability criteria Athlete- Representative in World Championships. Your editing skills need assessment as you should have removed your nomination for deletion request accordingly.

2. The term non-notable is offensive especially as the Athlete concerned has obvious notability, as per the article which you do not seem to have given analysis critically. Furthermore you have requested Administrator status however please read this criteria:

• • There are many good ways to advocate keeping, deleting, or even redirecting an article. This includes:

• Arguments commonly used to recommend deletion are: "unverifiable" (violates WP:V), "original research" (violates WP:NOR), and "non-notable" in cases where the subject does not meet their respective notability criteria. (In the cases of non-notable biographical articles, 'it is better to say "does not meet WP:BIO" 'to avoid insulting the subject'.)

3. You have not contributed ANY further discussion on this matter, nor given any further feedback nor evidence as to why you nominated this article in the first place. Not good WIKI pedian policy is it?

Ref: Article for deletion page April 19, 2009

-KEEP ***Note : Notability is established. as per Administrator 19 April 2009 Notability as Australian Representative at Karate World Championships; Founder Martial Artist and only undefeated member of Australian team at the FIRST World Karate Championship (1970);Founder of Australian Karate Federation; First Caucasian Master Teacher graduate (in the world) of Japan Karate do College (1973). Shizuoka budoka (talk) 10:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

NOTE: Furthermore: See the following guidelines: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Athlete#Athletes Athletes/Shortcuts:WP:ATH /WP:ATHLETE

Shizuoka budoka (talk) 07:39, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews I admire your efforts in reverting vandalism and deleting spam and non-notable articles. However, I note that you are sometimes a bit quick off the mark as with Roman_Town_House,_Dorchester. (I myself have erred this way in the past). Sometimes it is better to place a tag or work to improve the article yourself. Now that you have a broad view of what makes articles good, perhaps you should find areas of interest to work on by adding content. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

   Reverting vandalism has become my main focus when editing Wikipedia. I enjoy being a rollbacker and am glad to be trusted by many respected users of the community. I set several goals while editing and feel a sense of pride when I accomplish it/them.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   I have not been in any conflicts that I can recall.