Miss Grand International 2014 and others – Downgrade protection to ECP and allow AFC review of drafts Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Miss Grand International 2014 (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) Miss Grand International 2015 (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) Miss Grand International 2020 (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (restore) Miss Grand International 2021 (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (restore) The 2014 and 2015 articles were previously deleted due to not having enough sources to prove their notability and were then salted due to repeatedly being recreated. Also, the 2020 and 2021 contests was protected against creation due to the fact that the main article, Miss Grand International, was deleted and salted. Since its main article was about reduced protection to ECP, per this this DRV, and was already recreated, as well as a bunch of info in Thai about its old 2014-2015 contests is available online, I already created the completed versions of each, with more sources provided that would justify recreating the deleted pages, as listed below. Sandbox 4 for Miss Grand International 2014 Sandbox 3 for Miss Grand International 2015 Draft:Miss Grand International 2020 for Miss Grand International 2020 (Protected redirect); the draft was previously rejected due to the non-existence of the main article before Feb 2022. Sandbox 6 for Miss Grand International 2021 Apologize for my English. Best regards. Thomson Walt (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply] Reduce protection to ECP and allow review of draft per the rationale on the main article's DRV. There are a lot of seemingly okay references in the linked sandbox versions. While DRV is not the place to review sources, these drafts should be sent to AFC where the references can be thoroughly reviewed.Frank Anchor 18:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC).[reply] Downgrade protection to ECP of all four titles, as per Frank Anchor. DRV is not the best forum to review sandbox drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply] Allow Review of Drafts at AFC. (The reviewers have ECP.) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Miss Grand International 2014 and others – Downgrade protection to ECP and allow AFC review of drafts Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

The 2014 and 2015 articles were previously deleted due to not having enough sources to prove their notability and were then salted due to repeatedly being recreated. Also, the 2020 and 2021 contests was protected against creation due to the fact that the main article, Miss Grand International, was deleted and salted. Since its main article was about reduced protection to ECP, per this this DRV, and was already recreated, as well as a bunch of info in Thai about its old 2014-2015 contests is available online, I already created the completed versions of each, with more sources provided that would justify recreating the deleted pages, as listed below.

Sandbox 4 for Miss Grand International 2014
Sandbox 3 for Miss Grand International 2015
Draft:Miss Grand International 2020 for Miss Grand International 2020 (Protected redirect); the draft was previously rejected due to the non-existence of the main article before Feb 2022.
Sandbox 6 for Miss Grand International 2021

Apologize for my English. Best regards. Thomson Walt (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reduce protection to ECP and allow review of draft per the rationale on the main article's DRV. There are a lot of seemingly okay references in the linked sandbox versions. While DRV is not the place to review sources, these drafts should be sent to AFC where the references can be thoroughly reviewed.Frank Anchor 18:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Downgrade protection to ECP of all four titles, as per Frank Anchor. DRV is not the best forum to review sandbox drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Allow Review of Drafts at AFC. (The reviewers have ECP.) Robert McClenon (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.