Articles

• Enterprise Business Architecture (history · last edit) from [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]

No version of the article is free from copyright violation as the entire content has been cut/pasted, in sections, from at least five different sources. One IP editor claims in an edit summary that some of it is used with permission, so he deserves a notice. - KrakatoaKatie 05:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• KC Stadium (history · last edit) from [6].

Most of the facts and figures seem to have simply been copy-and-pasted from the source. 157.203.43.103 14:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Fruit (history · last edit) copied from [7].

Note the headings are identical and most of the body of the article appears to be lifted.--Old Hoss 19:02, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• MPhil Futures Studies (history · last edit) from [8].

The section from "The programme is designed to expose..." is identical to the "Key Outcomes" seection in the external link. 85.73.209.160 21:41, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Taylor Mali (history · last edit) from [9]. -wizzard2k ^(C•T•D) 22:15, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

• Image:Gundestrup C.jpg (history · last edit) from [10]. |EPO| 14:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Gundestrup E.jpg (history · last edit). |EPO| 14:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both this image and the one above are almost 2-D works of art. Does the minute about of shading in the image qualify the photographs for copyright protection? – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 18:46, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]