This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions[edit]

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Wikipedia:CCI#Open_investigations to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

Text

  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place ((subst:CCI|name=Contributor name)) on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place ((subst:cclean)) on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with ((subst:copyvio)), linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place ((subst:copyvio|url=see talk)) on the article's face and ((subst:CCId|name=Contributor name)) on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add ((y))) or not (add ((n))). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the ((y)). The ((?)) template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)

Background[edit]

Kiraroshi1976

  1. The earliest revision of Anders Hove (actor), created in January 2015, has information copied from an archived copy of IMDB in October 2013. Apart from the sentence about the crossovers, the "His first real movie role" Wikipedia paragraph is largely identical to IMDB.
  2. This December 2016 revision of Happy Mother's Day, Love George includes the entire review from New York Times skipping the cast part. An archived copy on their website is online since June 2016.
  3. The first two sentences in the career section from an October 2017 revision of The Nassau Guardian includes content that I can find as far back as August 2007. While another user has changed 1931 to 1831 in the current version, the copyvio largely remains.
  4. A September 2015 article creation of Zach Appelman had copyvio added from a Wordpress interview from November 2012. While some copyvios were removed (such as "didn’t do theater, really, as a kid", "did a lot of sports in High School" "and a lot of competitive martial arts", a bit remains like "first job out of grad school was playing Tybalt in Romeo and Juliet"
  5. The sentence about military tests that were added in an April 2016 revision of Nicholas Irving is largely the same as the New York Post from January 2015. The only difference is changing "but he took to life" to "but Irving took to life". The sentence about not passing the Navy Seals test was exactly the same. This copyvio no longer appears in the current Wikipedia version.

I also noticed that this user has multiple talk page messages about copyright issues. Of these talk page messages, some of their edits that were RevDeleted for copyvio concerns according to the edit summaries. These include edits to Sons of the American Legion, American Grit, Washington's Spies, and The Serpent Warriors. As I'm not an administrator, I can't verify what was copied or not copied. This is my first CCI request. If I did anything wrong, please let me know. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For #3, i meant History, not Career. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello I'm not even sure how to respond, but I will try. I have made great effort not do copyright stuff since 2016. However, I am not perfect, and I do try to learn from my mistakes. I tried looking at the link that was given to me to respond. I do not understand as to where to respond. I apologize, but I am confused as to where to respond. I will endeavor not to fringe on copyrights- Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Kiraroshi1976: Hello again! You;ve replied at the right spot per my talk page message to you. Thank you for leaving a message here :) Also, for whoever reviews this: I think the CCI-request template is outdated as there's no Responding to a CCI case section. I think it should be swapped to Review of CCI requests to prevent other Wikipedians from getting confused as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Report any violations after February 2019 to an admin. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 20:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Kiraroshi1976 02. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 04:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subpage is complete. MER-C 16:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiraroshi1976[edit]

Pages 1 through 20

Pages 21 through 40

Pages 41 through 60

Pages 61 through 80

Pages 81 through 100

Pages 101 through 120

Pages 121 through 140

Pages 141 through 160

Pages 161 through 180

Pages 181 through 200

Pages 201 through 220

Pages 221 through 240

Pages 241 through 260

Pages 261 through 280

Pages 281 through 300

Pages 301 through 320

Pages 321 through 340

Pages 341 through 360

Pages 361 through 380

Pages 381 through 400

Pages 401 through 420

Pages 421 through 440

Pages 441 through 460

Pages 461 through 480

Pages 481 through 500

Pages 501 through 520

Pages 521 through 540

Pages 541 through 560

Pages 561 through 580

Pages 581 through 600

Pages 601 through 620

Pages 621 through 640

Pages 641 through 660

Pages 661 through 680

Pages 681 through 700

Pages 701 through 720

Pages 721 through 740

Pages 741 through 760

Pages 761 through 780

Pages 781 through 800

Pages 801 through 820

Pages 821 through 840

Pages 841 through 860

Pages 861 through 880

Pages 881 through 900

Pages 901 through 920

Pages 921 through 940

Pages 941 through 960

Pages 961 through 980

Pages 981 through 1000

Pages 1001 through 1080

Pages 1081 through 1220

Pages 1221 through 1500

Pages 1501 through 2027

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2020-09-16T20:00:07.844901Z. Survey URL: http://wikipediatools.appspot.com/contributionsurveyor.jsp?mode=on&user=Kiraroshi1976&wiki=en.wikipedia.org&noreverts=1&nodrafts=1&earliest=&latest=&bytefloor=150

More