Comment: I don't believe they are referring to the same team given that Egremont F.C. is an association football side while Egremont Rangers is a rugby league side. Kosack (talk) 18:08, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to reduce ambiguity (making Reformed a clear proper name, it is not like the church buildings have been reformed) and to align with sibling Category:Calvinist and Reformed Christians. Please refrain from comments on churches versus church buildings, this is only a very small nomination in which we are not going to solve that problem. In this rename nomination churches are kept churches and church buildings are kept church buildings. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: the head article for this Balkan country has been moved from "Republic of Macedonia" to North Macedonia per an RM discussion closed on 13 Feb 2019). The closer @MSGJ noted an overwhelming consensus that now is the right time to move this article.
Category names should follow the country name, so this nomination is a first step on that path. To simplify matters, I have tried to make a start by taking only the simplest and most clearcut cases, i.e. those which:
use the full phrase "Republic of Macedonia", and not the demonym "Macedonian" (so no Category:Macedonian people etc)
do not approximate the title of a public office (e.g. Category:Presidents of the Republic of Macedonia)
do not refer to the participation of the country in international organisations such as the United Nations, which sometimes uses a name different to the name chosen by Wikipedia's naming policies
do not refer to a national sports team of the country or to the country's participation in international multi-sport events such as the Olympics, since those sports and events may have their own naming procedures
This left a list of ~660 categories.
These exclusions are not intended to prejudice future discussions of the other categories. Maybe the others will all be renamed without controversy, or maybe they need to be discussed in smaller sets. But simplifying this list will allow this discussion to focus on the principle, rather than on any exceptions. If you spot any categories listed above which you think should be left for a future discussion, please strike them or ping me and I will strike them. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 01:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Small notes - I note at least one stub category (which may need an associated template change), and am not sure some of the "expatriate" categories need to exist -- those cats appear to be over-categorization of footballers. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@power~enwiki: Yes, the stub cats will need template changes, so I have grouped the 3 stub cats together.
Please could we leave questions of deletion for another day? This sort of mass renaming nomination can rapidly become unwieldy and confusing if it strays off the core renaming proposal. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 02:37, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]