Category:Irving Berlin songs
[edit]Category:Burial sites of the Trpimirović dynasty
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: delete, these categories do not contain any sites, in the final rungs there are just people and these people are - not coincidentally - the same people as in the parent category Category:Trpimirović dynasty. It's a sort of circular categorization. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Anti-neo-Nazi activism
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: split. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Unlike Anti-fascism and Anti-racism, two political movements with a considerable tradition, Anti-neo-Nazi activism is not at all a commonly used term. It is therefore not surprising that, after all the years, the category still doesn't have a main article. With most categorized organizations or projects explicitly committing themselves either to anti-racism, or more specifically to anti-fascism, I don't see any useful criteria to distinguish an "Anti-neo-Nazi-activism" that isn't correctly categorized by the anti-fascism or anti-racism categories. --PanchoS (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support but only to the Anti-fascism target -- I would merely comment that some of the Anti-fascists are about as bad as the Fascists. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to anti-fascist – Most anti-fascist organizations are also anti-racist organizations, but the converse is not necessarily true. Each article should be considered individually to determine whether it belongs in one or both of the target categories. Ibadibam (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to anti-fascist. Neo-nazism is a form of fascism and the opposition is a variant of anti-fascism. Actual stance on issues of racism may vary wildly. Dimadick (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support the split. Some of the articles should be placed in Category:Anti-racism/Category:Anti-racist organizations and probably are more appropriately placed there than than in Category:Anti-fascism/Category:Anti-fascist organizations. For instance, Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice seems to be more about anti-racism than anti-fascism. I agree that all of the articles should not be merged into both of the targets, but that's not what was proposed. What was proposed was to split them between the two categories, as appropriate. That may mean an article goes in one, or the other, or both. I support the initial nomination, not a blanket merge to anti-fascist. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:21, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Siblinghood
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: I fail to see how this category distinguishes itself from its parent category:Sibling, which is too small for splitting. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.