< November 3 | November 5 > |
---|
The result of the debate was rename both. the wub "?!" 12:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The two subcategories need to be recapitalised and I suggest making the names clearer and bringing them into line with the geographical categories at the same time.
*Rename to Category:Alister MacKenzie designs. Merchbow 09:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Sock puppet of Calsicol [1] Tim! 17:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 12:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 12:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Boris and Arkady Strugatsky to Category:Arkady and Boris Strugatsky
The result of the debate was merge. the wub "?!" 15:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Free Invision Power Board hosts into Category:Forum hosting
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 14:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Number 1 Single (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete, Not every single TV series ever needs its own category. Otto4711 17:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. I'm sure there was another article in this when I did the previous rename, but I can't remember what it was or find it now. the wub "?!" 17:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contains one article -- M.U.G.E.N. itself. Andre (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 16:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only contains one article, which is a disambiguation page about a minor Sonic game. Not really used, and there are very few notable ROM hacks anyway. Andre (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Big Brother US contestants. The shows in each country are completely separate from each other. the wub "?!" 16:57, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Big Brother US Contestants into Category:Big Brother contestants
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 16:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 16:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was speedy deleted. the wub "?!" 12:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 12:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 14:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 12:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Anti-French people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete "Anti-French" is a simplistic label which would be debatable and POV in every case, if the category wasn't empty. It is also hard to see how it could be a defining characteristic of anyone with an article. Merchbow 14:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete Not a defining characteristic. Calsicol 14:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 20:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Local Filament galaxies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 20:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Crater cloud (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus --Kbdank71 20:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 20:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Ursa Major North group to Category:M109 Group
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 20:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:LSB galaxies to Category:Low surface brightness galaxies
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 19:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Multiply-imaged quasars into Category:Gravitationally lensed quasars
Category:Double-imaged quasars into Category:Gravitationally lensed quasars
Category:Quadruple-imaged quasars into Category:Gravitationally lensed quasars
The result of the debate was rename/merge to Category:The Lord of the Rings film music --Kbdank71 15:43, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:The Lord of the Rings music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:The Lord of the Rings music to Category:The Lord of the Rings film trilogy music
Rename - Used for The Lord of the Rings film trilogy only. Ignores the existence of music for other adaptations, such as the score for the 1978 cartoon version. Rather presumptuous to pre-empt the term. It should be renamed to a more specific Category:The Lord of the Rings film trilogy music. Uthanc 07:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
New proposal:
Category:The Lord of the Rings music to Category:The Lord of the Rings film music (or some other wording)
Rename - Used for The Lord of the Rings film trilogy only, but should include music from other film adaptations. Rename also to avoid overlapping with non-film LOTR music. Uthanc 14:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Surviving silent film actors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated --Kbdank71 15:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 15:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Surviving veterans of the First World War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was merge into Category:Fictional frogs and toads. the wub "?!" 14:22, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 15:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 15:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Living mobsters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 22:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Kane (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
While Kane is notable, he certainly doesn't need a category of his own. Useless category, and category cruft (if such a thing exists). RobJ1981 02:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 22:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Ergo Proxy Images (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Delete, one only image category. Rluoeoy 02:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. Already listed under Category:Flavor of Love. the wub "?!" 22:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Flavor of Love spinoffs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
There is already a Flavor of Love category for these shows to be listed under. A category for the two FoL spinoff shows is not needed. Ckessler 01:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was keep --Kbdank71 15:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 22:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Newcastle United F.C. Number 9's (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Cruft, quite simply. Apart from the fact that before the days of fixed squad numbers, a variety of players could have worn the number 9 for Newcastle for as few as one or two games, as well as the fact it is very hard to verify for many players of old, this sets a highly dangerous precedent. By rights the same kind of category could be created for each shirt number between 1 and 11 (and possibly above) for hundreds of top-flight football teams, which would mean the creation of thousands of categories of very little informative use. Delete Qwghlm 01:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]