Operator: Magioladitis
Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic, supervised for most of the edits
Source code available: On request. Simple F&R
Function overview: Replace superscripted text with normal.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): The Manual of Style reads:
Edit period(s): One-off to clean the backlog and regularly in the future.
Estimated number of pages affected: 10k per database scan
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function details: Yobot, using a custom AWB module will cleanup results given by latest database scan replacing <sup>th</sup> with th. Text in quotes, etc. will be excluded. Edits will apply AWB general fixes where (and only where) other edits are taking place.
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — The Earwig (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I checked them all. They look fine.
I didn't touch "nth" because I guess they have to be fixed to "n-th" and not "nth". I also didn't touch "1st", "2nd" and "3rd" which I 'll do seperatelly. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
While still excluding refs by default, citations like ((cite book)) can have their |edition=
field fixed. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please clarify what "Automatic, supervised" means. Either it is automatic or it is supervised. Supervised means you constantly monitor the bot's changes and react to problems promptly. If it is supervised for some time/edits and not others; then the way this is currently phrased would allow the bot to run unsupervised, i.e. automatically. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does the MoS apply to quoted text as well (because it does not exclude it in the phrasing)? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:47, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Would 34th in Ordinal_indicator#English get false positived? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 18:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You mention "I also didn't touch "1st", "2nd" and "3rd" which I 'll do seperatelly". Do you plan to do that under this task's approval or separate, or non-bot manually? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You mention dates shouldn't have the superscript, but how is it handled, like "November 23rd, 1968" in La_source_(Balanchine)? Does it replace or remove, and if so, by what rules? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can perform a database scan to see how many they are with "nd" and "rd". IF they are few I can fix them manually. Otherwise under this task's approval. My method fixes the "November 23rd, 1968" but in the second phase (i.e. when I fix nd and rd). -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]