The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic (once run)

Programming Language(s): PHP

Function Summary: Substing user talk page templates

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): When run (weekly)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Substing the given user talk page templates on given talk pages, example(note this was controlled and I had to "click" save before it wrote) This currently only works for each template that I input and get the list of "what links here (trans)" for and inputting e.t.c. I don't possibly see how this bot can make a mistake. (List = here.

Which user talk templates? -- maelgwn - talk 23:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Im planning on working my way through Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/User_talk_templates as there you have virtually every talk page template that can need substing. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 06:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why no AWB? ;P —Reedy 09:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't mein dusing AWB but I cant find what automaticly subst's the needed templates in AWB. Also I cant transfer Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/User_talk_templates into just a plain text list easily. (no numbers , no template:, no wikilinks) ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 10:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. BJ^Talk 22:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will get around to doing these shortly(within the day) have been away for a while. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 06:47, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have done the trial edits. You can see them here. [1]. All went ok by what I can see. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. BJ^Talk 18:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.