The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. No delete vote. PeaceNT 08:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zylstra[edit]

Zylstra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Thank you for withdrawing your nomination. I will add some more information to the page as soon as I can. user:zylstra555

RE: To all replys[edit]

Ok, I completely understand. What if I can circulate this around to a few people and get more non-cited original information on it within a week?

I'll widthdraw my nomination, good luck on the article. --Hojimachong^talk 06:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no notability, cited Ancestry.com? Barely escaped a speedy. --Hojimachong^talk 23:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So why is my article being considered for deletion? user:zylstra555

Notability assertion? It is also somewhat incoherent. --Hojimachong^talk 00:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I am not exactly the greatest user of Wikipedia, I must admit, when it comes to editing and adding pages. I apologize, if you believe that the page should surely be removed, then go ahead. -- user:Zylstra555

I tried to clean up the article; tell me if I completely screwed it up. --Hojimachong^talk 06:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.