The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The article does have some sources. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yourenew.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:Notability/Near advertising Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 06:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No RS; basically just an advertisement/directory entry. Sources added do not provide significant coverage. Springnuts (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Speedy Delete A7, no assertion of notability. Wikipedia is not a web directory. --neon white talk 07:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Reliable sources have now been added. --neon white talk 08:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Wikipedia may not be a web directory, but look at sources - relevant to consumers, relevant to recycling. 07:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC) (128.36.43.81 / 128.36.43.122)
• Keep Fox News, New Haven Register, New Haven Independent and Yale Daily News are notable sources. This isn't promotion, it just explains the platform. 07:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC) (128.36.43.81 / 128.36.43.122)
• Comment. Please note the two IP contributions above are by the same IP address and within a few minutes of each other ... and the IP address location is in New Haven which is also the location of the YouRenew company. Springnuts (talk) 12:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are both slightly different ips making valid points, well the second one is at least. --neon white talk 15:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Springnuts - nz26 Talk | Contribs | Email | Editor Review 08:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources have been provided disproving this point. New Haven Independent , New Haven Register and FOX 61 News have all covered the site. --neon white talk 08:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I disagree with this - nothing substantial has been added. FWIW much of what has been added amounts to further advertising. I still say - delete. Springnuts (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still believe it's a delete for the same reasons as Springnuts.Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 04:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - There is significant to exclusive coverage of the subject in multiple reliable sources in the article (Norwell Mariner, New Haven Independent, New Haven Register, Yale Daily News, and Xconomy) that establish notability per WP:WEB, if not WP:GNG. Note that the Fox 61 News link seems to be broken. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The video is available but cannot be directly linked to. if you follow the link and go to page 2 of the video player, it's the top one titled 'Recycling Electronics, TV on the Web' dated 3/20. it contains significant coverage including interviews with the founders. --neon white talk 18:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• delete. One month old site that is making a nice marketing campaign, gets news published on a few places, but... far from notable. - Nabla (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.