The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yonassan Gershom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet general notability requirements Lactarius volemus (talk) 12:40, 10 July 2011 (UTC) — Lactarius volemus (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Keep. The article contains multiple references to coverage in independent sources, including (but not limited to) a full chapter about him in a book[1] and a feature in the Minneapolis Star Tribune[2].--Arxiloxos (talk) 13:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notability is strongly established by the inclusion of multiple reliable and verifiable sources about the article's subject. Alansohn (talk) 02:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Appears to easily meet the WP:GNG. Qrsdogg (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.