The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yoga South Africa

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Incoherent article, reads like a personal essay. No reliable sources - Yoga SA is not an organisation Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it is mostly made up. There is a list of Buddhists who visited South Africa, but Buddhism is not Yoga. «"Yoga in South Africa" started in the 1940s, to become an important source of wellness in country» is just a mess. Spumuq (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nom and Spumuq, it's an incoherent mess, not an article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not of encyclopaedic value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobmacmillan (talk • contribs) 13:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.