The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Jimfbleak per CSD G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

XNXX[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no indication given of notability of site, all references are simply links to website Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam. I requested speedy deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only RS is passing mention (well, among 400000 other pages...). Speedy delete may be appropriate. Pavlor (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:17, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is a user guide for a non-notable website. The only reliable source cited does not even mention the site. The site's claim of popularity is the only thing saving it from an A7 speedy. Just another porn tube. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.