The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KO loss, aka speedy delete CSD A7. Resurgent insurgent (as admin) 16:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wyatt Routson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Someone other than the author has removed the speedy tag, but I see no evidence of notability from reliable third party sources. I suggest deletion. — coelacan — 01:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete under WP:CSD A7, and so tagged. I see nothing like an assertion of notability here. If not speedy deleted, delete as not notable. Unsourced, which is not alone a deletion reason, but earns no points. DES ^(talk) 04:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Most things that get as far as Afd are worth discussing. Not this one. DGG 04:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, maybe possibly asserts notability, but doesn't demonstrate it. NawlinWiki 14:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.