The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Development Foundation

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this non-profit organization fails the WP:ORG guidelines due to a lack of verifiable significant impact. Being a NGO does not, of itself, demonstrate notability. Apart from the one tangential mention in the Calcutta Telegraph article, I have been unable to find other sources using Google News. Fæ (talk) 17:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 17:43, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fæ (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. And there is no significant independent coverage--Sodabottle (talk) 03:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.