The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:43, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Work content (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There seems to be a real concept of "work content" which has to do with people doing things, and which has nothing to do with what the article says— and the text of the article never uses the term it is supposedly explaining. In short, WP:TNT for the redlink. Mangoe (talk) 03:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 04:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - the page is just an group of statements and equations about various aspects of energy and thermodynamics which are better stated on their respective pages, so a merge is unnecessary. I don't recall ever hearing the term 'work content' being used in this context, so a redirect would not seem to be useful. Agricolae (talk) 05:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Redundant with Thermodynamic free energy. XOR'easter (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.