The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 04:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woolahra Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

In violation of WP:NOT#TRAVEL, with no referenced assertions of why it is notable. Reads like an advertisement Russavia 19:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - per CSD A7. Luke! 02:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with nom's assessment. Pascal.Tesson 04:41, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:59, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It sounds like a very nice, but not notable hotel. I liked the missing L story, though.--Slp1 23:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Bduke 00:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Google News Archives shows some sources indicating that the Bistro Moncur is run by a talented chef. [1]. However, it isn't enough for an article. Capitalistroadster 02:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I think it may be iconic but that isn't an inclusion criteria here.Garrie 03:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable hotel. Keb25 09:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non Notable Hotel Twenty Years 11:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.