The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Rather obvious candidate for a speedy deletion; the discussion is very quickly coming to the same conclusion. jbmurray (talk • contribs) 19:00, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Edit- Article based

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be some kind of original research. PROD was removed by article creator without an explanation. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a copyvio, I'd say - of the book cited. Or as a test page. Content bears no relation to the title. Peridon (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, test page which belongs in sandbox. The user looks like part of a York College class using Wikipedia... Ansh666 18:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

note Wikipedia Edit- Text based as well, from the same user. I posted on the Education noticeboard asking whether anyone had talked to the professor (User:Dr Ashton or the class Wikipedia:School and university projects/York College CUNY Industrial/Organizational Psychology. Ansh666 18:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. czar · · 18:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as nonsense and please ask User:Dr Ashton to keep his pupils in check. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.